Tag Archives: facebook

Re: No, Pinterest Is Not the Next Facebook

Preface: I took “Facebook vs. Pinterest” very literally for the sake of this post. I didn’t have to, I could have approached it a different way, but I chose to approach it this way. It’s really about Facebook’s longevity as a social network. Something to keep in mind while you read.

You’ve probably seen the headline ‘Is Pinterest the New Facebook?’ somewhere on the Internet by now. Right off the bat my reaction to this headline is mostly laughter (laughing on the inside), although I understand why some people might ask that question. Pinterest has become the hottest destination on the Web over the last few months, but that doesn’t make it the new Facebook. There’s obviously an amazing team over at Pinterest that has held its ground for years trying to make things work, and clearly they’ve pulled it off. But what Pinterest has pulled off is an incredibly engaging and social discovery experience; it’s new but at the same time it’s not. Yes, Facebook is also both engaging and social, but it goes deeper: it’s a social network that focuses more on connecting than discovery (of course Zuck and his team are working on improving the latter, but that’s a topic for another blog post). The two (connecting and discovery) obviously intersect because they are both social actions. Using the Web to discover all kinds of content and answers to our questions is fun, useful, and a great way to kill time, but discovery means so much less if we’re unable to share what we find.

Image via Business Insider

Facebook allows us to connect with the rest of the Web and the world in a deep and meaningful way (friends, Likes, status updates, photos, videos, profile information, Groups, Pages,  Messaging, etc.). Facebook has become our “home” online. We see connection happening on Pinterest, but it’s really just surface-level. We repin and Like and follow other people’s boards or other users, actions that are particular to discovery and content, and this is why Pinterest exploded. Discovery and design are both things Pinterest does very well. It’s a social network for expressing yourself. But Facebook, on the other hand, does not revolve around discovery – it revolves around information and building connections. If your wallet was a portfolio of the social networks you use, Facebook is your driver’s license: the single piece of identity that allows you to do anything you need to do and go wherever you need to go.

At the end of the day, what makes a social network “stick” are its users (or uses). Why do users come back? Why are users spending X amount of time on the site? How does the site support a users’ habits/likes/interests? Facebook has been around and it knows its users. Zuck and his team are constantly learning how to make Facebook feel more comfortable, more natural, somewhere users can retire to at the end of their day. Facebook also made a huge splash in what I like to refer to as the “digital memories” space with Timeline. The Facebook experience is no longer a series of login/logouts, but one that continues to live on and archive itself even when you’re not online. This is what I like to call a “deep network experience” (I actually made that up just now, but it sounds cool, right?).

Pinterest very recently launched a redesign of user profiles to make them “more beautiful” and “different in kind than the profile [users] have on Facebook” (Pinterest CEO, Ben Silbermann, speaking at SXSW 2012). I’m a huge fan of the redesign. I think the profiles look great, and I think this – Pinterest’s strength in design – will be how Silbermann and his team get people using (and sharing) the site more often. But what people are sharing are discoveries, not memories. I think this is important to note. You might forget about that awesome pair of shoes you found on Pinterest last week, but you won’t forget about the time you stayed out until 5am on a work night with your best friends and watched the sunrise over the beach (especially when there are pictures, status updates, and check-ins to help you remember).

Pinterest is the new Facebook? I don’t think so. When the sun rises over that beach at 5am and a new day begins, it feels good. You know who you are, you know where you are, and you want to tell the world. Facebook is where your friends will hear about it, not Pinterest. And it’s experiences like this – being able to share and connect with an already established, deep network – that will make it very hard for any social network to be the new Facebook.

‘Reporting Live From Facebook News’ (Let’s Talk About Social Journalism)

Here we go. According to Fusible.com, Facebook has purchased a set of “newsroom” domains (read this for more details). As an update to the original story, one of Facebook’s PR agencies – The OutCast Agency – has responded by explaining the domains are “part of an upgrade to Facebook’s press room” and “not part of a new product.” However, because I’ve become very interested in the social journalism space as of late, I’m going to write about the potential here anyway.

Some of you that follow social media and journalism trends closely have probably already considered the following. But for those that haven’t, imagine this. Facebook News. Not just your friends filling your news feed with stories they’ve read on Yahoo – I’m talking about Facebook as a news product. Think about it: Facebook is arguably the hottest company on the planet right now with almost 1 billion users, people anywhere from ages 12-75. For the sake of this post, everyone that uses the internet is on Facebook (even though that’s probably not 100% true, but it has to be close). Meanwhile, there are millions and millions of people that are turning to the Web and social networks to consume news stories, especially those that are just developing. Right now this is happening mostly on Twitter where The New York Times, CNN and hundreds of other major news organizations are pushing real-time updates to followers.

Enter opportunity. Imagine Facebook as its own news organization; an online newsroom, reporters, cameras.. even a weatherman (why not, right?). It’s not so crazy if you really think about it. But what would this do for news? For journalism? How would this affect the way people consume news online? Could Facebook become a trusted news source? Would this inspire younger people (think teenagers) to consume news online and stay up-to-date with local and global news?

A Facebook News organization would be a huge step for social media and journalism. Is it inevitable? Or should Facebook stay away from breaking its own news stories? Let me know your thoughts in the comments section or by discussing with me on Twitter @davehennessy.

Living Online, Pt. II (Human Beings and Social Technology)

The last post I wrote on slowmorningblog higlighted the explosion of social network Pinterest and the idea of “living online” (or living through your social networks). I decided to continue writing on this subject because it intrigues me (although this post will be short and more a flurry of additional thoughts).

As we continue to see more successful social networks and applications dominate the Web (Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Pinterest, Instagram – the list goes on), no one is denying that digital has become an integral part of our existence as human beings. The social Web has become a part of us, and most of us realize our desire to share our experiences with others isn’t something that casually comes and goes – social is something that has been built into us. As individuals, we all have different stories and different things we bring to the social Web, and that in itself is what makes social experiences on the Web interesting and also unending. The “digisphere” has become a place for users to share experiences and create experiences; this happens through discovery.

Twitter / Discovery

Maybe this is something a lot of you already know. Perhaps I’m repeating myself a bit. I think it’s just because I’m really excited about the future relationship between human beings and social technology. 2011 introduced us ways to listen to music together, watch television and movies together, pay our friends back with our iPhones, and hang out in virtual bars on Facebook. What will 2012 bring? How will social networks of the future inspire us to engage with one another? Inspire us to be different, to be creative, to be successful? Lots of questions, not so many answers (yet), but really fun to think about.

There’s definitely another post or two on this subject in the back of my head somewhere. I just wanted to get a few more words out while it was on my mind. More to come later. In the meantime, tweet me @davehennessy and let me know what your current favorite social network is and why – I’d love to hear!

Social Discovery and Living Online (Spotlight: Pinterest)

If you belong to any kind of social network (you do), you experience social discovery. Social networking giants like Facebook, Twitter, and Google+ have realized that giving users the ability to be selective and as private as they’d like to be keeps people coming back. As a user of a social network, you see friends’ specific updates, photos, videos, music, news, and recommendations of any kind because you choose to. The model of following/unfollowing an individual, brand or idea is what continues to drive positive social experiences on the Web right now. Using social sites and the Web in general isn’t about just coming and going anymore. The social Web is becoming a user’s “home,” completely customized and protected just like someone’s house would be. Facebook doesn’t want you to just connect online, it wants you to live online.

Pinterest

This post was inspired by a couple of blazing hot social startups – namely Pinterest, Quora, and Clipboard (among many others) – that seem to have nailed this idea of ‘The Web as Your Web‘ on the head. Pinterest sticks out for me mostly because I’m a user and I’m able to see and understand how easy it is to use the service and get others using it as well. For those of you that aren’t yet familiar, Pinterest is a visual pinboard for sharing and collecting content online. Users sign up for Pinterest and are able to ‘pin’ any image or video they find anywhere on the Web to a ‘board’ on Pinterest. Users can create different boards and organize the content they collect by naming boards ‘Architecture,’ ‘Cooking,’ ‘Design,’ ‘Fashion,’etc.

If you aren’t using Pinterest yet, I’m guessing you’re thinking that sounds pretty cool, right? It is. Pinterest has created a visually-stunning experience that allows users to gather content that matters to them from anywhere on the Web and keep it in a central location. They are helping shape a shift from search to discovery. And, on top of this shift, sites like Etsy – an online marketplace for very small businesses and individuals as vendors – are experiencing a huge increase in Web traffic because of Pinterest. Why is this? It’s because of social sharing (social discovery). People using Etsy are pinning all kinds of different products (on Etsy) to Pinterest, which in turn show up in Pinterest users’ streams. Add a price and a URL and vendors on Etsy are now “selling” on Pinterest.

This is the power of providing users with positive experiences and ways of allowing users to share those experiences. The Web continues to become more a user’s “home” every day. We’ve seen something similar with Facebook’s Timeline, where users can see their entire experience on Facebook on the same page just by scrolling (“lifestreaming”). Now it’s Pinterest, allowing users to collect content from anywhere on the Web and organize it however they like. What’s next?

(Follow me on Pinterest and Quora; I don’t use Clipboard… yet)

Facebook Announces Huge Changes As The ‘Social War’ Heats Up

Facebook’s annual f8 conference: a few hours every year where some of the most innovative companies in the world announce partnerships with Mark Zuckerberg’s social network and tech journalists liveblog every word they hear with their jaws on the floor. And for good reason.

Mark Zuckerberg introducing Timeline at f8 2011

This year at f8, Mark Zuckerberg and his team announced new Facebook features and partnerships that will change the way media is shared and consumed online for many years to come. Much of the f8 hype was about “Open Graph technology” – or the integrating of Web pages into the social graph – which Zuckerberg continually touched on throughout the conference. He also announced perhaps the biggest coming change to Facebook: the extinction of the Facebook profile and the introduction of Timeline. Timeline is basically Facebook’s idea of an individual’s social “life hub.” Everything you post, share or Like on Facebook (and other parts of the Web) is put into your Timeline – status updates, photos, shared YouTube videos, Spotify playlists, etc.

Facebook’s Timeline has definitely received some criticism since being announced, but it has also received some high praise by early adopters. Some say it’s a huge invasion of privacy, some say it’s beautifully designed, and some say it’s just too much of a change and that they’d prefer to keep their “old profile.” I’m personally loving Timeline (yes, I couldn’t wait so I enabled it early – thanks TechCrunch) and I absolutely think it’s a step towards a new, meaningful kind of social networking.

With Facebook’s new changes, the ‘social war’ being fought between Facebook, Google and Twitter gets really interesting. Facebook has introduced Timeline, Ticker (real-time updates from friends) and a handful of new media partners (Spotify, Netflix, Rdio, Yahoo, and Hulu to name a few) that will allow users to connect, share and engage with friends and family in real-time. Twitter continues to position itself as a real-time news and content network. Google+ has set itself up to be a strong Facebook competitor with features like Hangouts, Circles (Google’s answer to privacy and sharing concerns) and a very simplistic design – not to mention the search rank boost content gets on Google+.

So, what social network has the advantage? Will Facebook’s changes pull users away from Twitter and Google+? Or vice versa? Or do we continue using all three social networks and say they each have their own advantages? I’d love to hear your thoughts.

FYI – I am indeed on all three social networks. Feel free to add me on Twitter and Google+ (Facebook I only use for personal).

A New Startup Called Shaker and Why What They’re Doing Matters (Social + Data)

For those of you that followed TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2011, you’re by now well-aware of the winner – an Israeli startup named Shaker. Before the event even started, Robert Scoble had predicted the company would win. His first reaction to the startup [on Twitter] was “Gonna be a big deal.”

Shaker @ TC Disrupt SF 2011

After seeing his first tweet about the startup, I ended up on their website and signed up for an invite. Somehow I got in right away. I found myself using Shaker and immediately thinking “This is cool, but I’ve seen this kind of thing before.” Turns out I was very wrong. After reading up on the startup (TechCrunch’s coverage, Robert Scoble’s coverage/video interview, etc.) I’m really starting to understand how much of a game changer Shaker is.

For those of you that aren’t familiar with the startup, Shaker is basically trying to bring the real social interaction and physical space of a bar setting online. You can choose which bar you want to hangout in, and upon entering you’ll be “assigned” an avatar. This avatar is actually your Facebook profile and data walking around with you as you interact with other people, buy drinks and even dance on tables (yes, you can dance on tables).

On first impression, what you’re looking at might just seem cool, but what’s going on behind-the-scenes (aka when you’re interacting with others, and really even when you’re not) is what’s really exciting. The reason Shaker is turning heads is because they understand the power of social + data. They’re giving people an opportunity and a space (many spaces) to hangout online and interact with strangers (and friends) in a way that isn’t “Facebook awkward.” You can log onto Facebook and “Like” things, comment on statuses and browse your friends’ photos, but that isn’t a real-life social experience – it’s a static one. Everything is one-way. Shaker has truly come up with something that is live, real and unpredictable.

What Shaker is doing with online data and real-world social interaction is why they’re currently the golden ticket of social startups. Say you’re in a bar (on Shaker) and you walk up to someone – you can immediately start a conversation with them, or join an ongoing conversation with multiple people. There are no “requests to join” or anything similar – it’s just like walking up to someone in an actual bar or coffee shop and talking to them. While you’re chatting with someone, you can browse their Facebook profile (only information they’ve made available to see) and also view their Liked pages and interests, which are sure to come up in conversation. Shaker also pulls your Facebook Event information and RSVP’s so you can actually identify what past events you both attended together (most likely without even knowing it) and what events you might both be attending in the future. And, aside from the all the app’s person-to-person interaction goodness, Shaker also lets you (and others) DJ songs in the bar you’re hanging out in, assuring that no conversation goes without good music in the background.

Shaker has definitely come up with a disruptive idea. It’s not just an experience that’s “cool” or “fun” – Shaker is bringing real social settings and interactions online. Ashton Kutcher made a comment at TC Disrupt SF a few days ago that ‘the most interesting and successful startups will be the ones that are blending the digital experience with the real-world’ [paraphrased]. This is certainly what Shaker is doing, and I’m excited to see less of a divide between online and offline as companies continue learning how to use data and tech continues to evolve.

Anyone on Shaker yet? Let me know in the comments section!

Turntable.fm for Musicians: How Hanging Out Can Build Your Fanbase

I had a great experience just the other day. I was on Twitter checking my @mentions and I read a tweet from someone (anonymous for now) that said he had really been into my playlist on Turntable.fm (which had been from a few days prior). I responded with “Thanks! 90s music is the best” (I had been hanging out in a 90s music room, an obvious choice). This one response to his original tweet and this similar taste in good music kicked off a discussion on Twitter between the two of us (complete strangers at the time) that lasted (casually) for multiple days. We talked about our internships, our tastes in music, developments in the tech and marketing space, and even touched on bands we used to play in. I eventually mentioned that I’m a musician and write my own music. See where this is going?

Turntable.fm

On Turntable.fm (for those of you not yet familiar), users can hang out in rooms that are categorized by musical style (or decade, like the 90s room I mentioned). Anyone with a friend on Facebook who’s on Turntable.fm can join and use the service. (If you’re not on Turntable.fm yet and don’t have a Facebook friend who’s on either, feel free to friend me on Facebook to gain access. You’re welcome). People join rooms and can search and upload music from iTunes or their own computers (musicians – another great way to promote your music) and play it for everyone in the room. There is a points system where users can vote the music you’re playing “Awesome” or “Lame” – obviously the more “Awesomes” you get the more points you make. Personally I don’t go on Turntable to accumulate points (or not yet at least) – I prefer using the community as a music-discovery service. I’ve already started listening to a number of bands I had never heard of before going on Turntable. For me, this is the most unique part of the service.

Back to my original point, though. Me and anonymous user had been in the same room and connected on Twitter because my Turntable username is @davehennessy (my Twitter handle). He had messaged me after hanging out in the 90s room and enjoying my playlist. We started a discussion (as I mentioned) and eventually got to the topic of music. The next time I logged onto Facebook, there was a notification that he had Liked my musician page on Facebook. Yes, it’s only one more fan, but take into consideration the entire process. I had been casually hanging out on Turntable.fm and was then tweeted based on my musical taste. This started a discussion (which also connected us on Twitter) and eventually led to another fan of my music on Facebook.

The Web is social now more than ever, my friends (and musicians especially). Use social services like Turntable to connect with others and build relationships. It’s fun, it’s casual, and it’s absolutely the future of marketing.

Oh, and go hit up those 90s rooms on Turntable. Gin Blossoms all day long.

What the Future of Advertising Could Mean for Casual Content Creators

To anyone that has been following since slowmorningblog launched almost a month and a half ago, I apologize for not updating since my post on April 22nd. I’ve been completely underwater with finals; thankfully that all ends after this week. Anyway, I’ve been scouring Twitter aslowmorningblognd blogs for the last 30 minutes and I came across a very interesting Monday morning entry by John Battelle (via Federated Media Publishing) about the future of advertising, specifically the idea of companies and brands paying consumers to watch advertisements. This got me thinking.

Say you’re using Hulu on your iPad and the program you selected is about to start. Before it begins, however, you’re prompted to select ‘Skip This AdorWatch This Ad for 10 credits’ (or cents, or another payment method). Would you watch it? Or would you skip the ad and get right to your program?

My thought is this: If the future of advertising does involve brands paying consumers to watch their advertisements, what does this mean for content creators (content creators that are not big name brands)? Will the trend become artists, musicians and filmmakers offering to pay people (media “consumers”) to watch or view their work? Think about the benefits:

  • Casual Facebook users (or users of potentially any other social networking site) could get payed to consume media (not just advertisements).
  • The content creators – musicians, filmmakers, artists, even bloggers – could pay people on the Web to a stream a song, watch a short film or view a piece of art. This gives content creators that are just starting out or without much of a following viewership they may have otherwise never had.
  • The middlemen, or Web payment services (I’m thinking PayPal) could potentially score huge should this trend become mainstream. Content creators and media consumers would have to set up accounts (if they don’t already have one) in order to pay/receive payment.

The future of advertising is heading in a more social direction. We’re already seeing this with interactive ads, and I believe the age of ‘casual-content-creator-pays-casual-Web-user’ is right around the corner.

What do you think about the future of advertising? Is it more social? Is it more interactive? Feel free to reply with a comment or tweet me @davehennessy.

Note: The John Battelle article I referenced in the beginning of the post can be read here.

Social Networking Isn’t Networking – It’s Life

slowmorningblogJust the other day I ran into a friend on campus and we started talking about a venue she works at. I told her I had recently been to a show there, and she responded with something along the lines of “Awesome. Next time you’re there definitely tweet me.” For some reason, her response kept me thinking all day. She didn’t say “call me,” she didn’t say “text me” – she said “tweet me.” I realize you may be beginning to wonder what the big deal is. After all, everyone uses Twitter, right? Everyone tweets, everyone direct messages, and everyone watches their follower count, so why the blog entry?

The reason I’m sharing my thoughts is not to highlight Twitter’s majestic micro-blogging wonder, but rather to comment on the impact future social networking sites like (or more realistically unlike) Twitter will have on the way we keep in touch with each other. Think about those words again: “Tweet me.” Take your phone out of your pocket, open a push-Twitter application and send me a message on an open network that everyone can see. While this is nothing new, one has to wonder what comes next. In a study done by Pew Research Center last summer, 71% of participants agreed with this statement:

“By 2020, most people won’t do their work with software running on a general-purpose PC. Instead, they will work in Internet-based applications such as Google Docs, and in applications run from smartphones. Aspiring application developers will develop for smartphone vendors and companies that provide Internet-based applications, because most innovative work will be done in that domain, instead of designing applications that run on a PC operating system.”

What does this mean for social networking? How will this change the way we stay in touch? The way we communicate? I believe that during the last few years the Web, mobile phones, and social networking have been evolving, we have seen social networking become less about networking and more about life. The use of sites like Facebook and Twitter have become less about “whenever I have time” and more integrated into our daily routines. As we continue to innovate the social Web, I believe we will see less structure and less of the “profile,” and much more open communication. While I’m unsure as to how these concepts will eventually mature and come to be, I’m excited to see what impact the future social Web has on the way we communicate and stay in touch.

How do you see the social Web changing? Leave a comment or tweet me @davehennessy. Extra points if you do it from your phone.

Why Small Businesses Should Be Looking Forward to the Weekend

slowmorningblogIf you run a small business, you know how hard it can be to grab users’ interest online. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other social sites have become crowded with companies and individuals trying to push content and engage consumers. Thankfully – according to research by Buddy Media - there is a best time for marketers and promoters to engage consumers on social networks – at the end of the week.

This Mashable article (posted on April 8th) says small businesses are more likely to see users engaging with content posted on sites like Facebook and Twitter on Thursdays and Fridays. The reason for this is because as the work week winds down, people are transitioning mentally from a “work-to-play” mindset. And because social networking sites are perfect destinations for real-time content – breaking news, weekend specials or viral videos (and of course your friends) – people are more likely to click-through content posted near the end of the work week. Put simply, people love Fridays – they’re more likely to read, “Like” and/or share your content because they have less on their plates.

So here’s the question: How can a small business best utilize its social presence online during the work week?

Avoid posting/sharing too much content on Monday mornings or any other time during the week that your content will be drowned out. Instead use this time to monitor conversations, play the customer service role and prepare more important social content to share later in the week. Remember, you should always utilize social – just don’t go overboard early in the week when people are just getting back to work and users’ news feeds will be cluttered with marketing messages. Know your target audience and what times they’re most likely to be on social networking sites and use that knowledge to your company’s advantage.